Craig Kuhary Criminal Defense
Contact Us 24/7 For a Free Consultation(262) 422-6106
30 Years Of Experienced Legal Guidance

Wisconsin court overturns drug conviction for probable cause issues

When it comes to the American criminal justice system, rules and procedure matter a great deal. All citizens are innocent until proven guilty, and evidence obtained improperly or illegally by law enforcement cannot be used against defendants in court.

The constitutional protection against illegal search and seizure is more valuable than many people realize. Recently, this protection helped overturn the drug crimes conviction of a Wisconsin man, even though police had discovered marijuana in his possession.

The original incident occurred in June 2010 at an apartment building in Milwaukee. Residents of the apartment complex complained to management that they had seen the defendant carrying a shotgun. The manager passed this information onto a security guard and police were eventually notified.

Law enforcement did not speak directly to the alleged witnesses. Instead, seven officers came directly to the suspect's door and alerted him to their presence. When he opened the door, he was handcuffed while police conducted a search. There were no guns in the apartment, but marijuana was discovered in the man's backpack.

The defendant was subsequently convicted of drug possession, and the case was later appealed. Earlier this month, the Wisconsin Court of Appeals overturned the conviction for a number of important reasons. In addition to their failure to interview witnesses, the officers also searched the man's apartment without a warrant or his consent. They also lacked probable cause to enter, to make a protective sweep of the apartment and to arrest the suspect.

In short, the marijuana evidence was inadmissible in court because law enforcement had no justification for the search that led to its discovery.

Commenting on the ruling, the court noted that "Other than the complaints about actions that occurred days before, the police had no cause for alarm. Up until this point (the defendant) had done nothing to trigger the immediate and forceful response of the police. Indeed, if his actions, under these circumstances, entitled police officers to seize a person and enter to 'clear' the apartment, then almost every suspect who answers a door would be subject to seizure or arrest."

Procedure matters; and police often cut corners during investigations and arrests. For this and other reasons, anyone facing criminal charges should seek the help of an experienced criminal defense attorney.

Source: Milwaukee Journal Sentinel, "Pot conviction reversed over improper arrest, entry and search," Bruce Vielmetti, Feb. 13, 2013

No Comments

Leave a comment
Comment Information
FindLaw Network

Schedule A Free Consultation

Bold labels are required.

Contact Information
disclaimer.

The use of the Internet or this form for communication with the firm or any individual member of the firm does not establish an attorney-client relationship. Confidential or time-sensitive information should not be sent through this form.

close

Privacy Policy